1. [1] Agren J. (2004), "The analytical continuation bias in geoid determination using potential coefficients and terrestrial gravity data", Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 78, pp. 314-332. [DOI:10.1007/s00190-004-0395-0]

2. [2] Balmino G., N. Vales, S. Bonvalot, and A. Briais (2012), "Spherical harmonic modelling to ultra-high degree of Bouguer and isostatic anomalies". Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 86, pp. 499–520. [DOI:10.1007/s00190-011-0533-4]

3. [3] Heiskanen W. and H. Moritz (1967), Physical Geodesy. San Francisco: WH Freeman.

4. [4] Jekeli C. (1981), "The downward continuation to the Earth's surface of the truncated spherical and ellipsoidal harmonic series of gravity and height anomalies". Rep. 327, Department of Geodetic Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus.

5. [5] Jekeli C. (1982), "A numerical study of the divergence of spherical harmonic series of the gravity and height anomalies at the Earth's surface". Bull. Geod. Sci. Affini, Vol. 57, pp. 10–28. [DOI:10.1007/BF02520909]

6. [6] Martinec Z. and P. Vanicek (1996), "Formulation of the boundary - value problem for geoid determination with a higher-degree reference field". Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 126, pp. 219–228. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-246X.1996.tb05280.x]

7. [7] Martinec Z. (1998), Boundary-value problems for gravimetric determination of a precise geoid. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences no.73. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.

8. [8] Nahavandchi H and L.E. Sjoberg (1998), "Terrain correction to power H^3 in gravimetric geoid determination". Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 72, pp. 124–135. [DOI:10.1007/s001900050154]

9. [9] Nahavandchi H. (2002), "Two different method of geoidal determination using a spherical harmonic representation of the geopotential, topographic corrections and the height anomaly– geoid height difference". Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 76, pp. 345-352. [DOI:10.1007/s00190-002-0253-x]

10. [10] Rapp R.H. (1997), "Use of potential coefficient models for geoid undulation determinations using aspherical harmonic representation of the height anomaly - geoid undulation difference". Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 71, pp. 282–289. [DOI:10.1007/s001900050096]

11. [11] Sjoberg L.E. (1977), "On the errors of spherical harmonic developments of gravity at the surface of the Earth". Rep. 257, Department Geodetic Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus.

12. [12] Sjoberg L.E. (1995), "On the quasigeoid to geoid separation". Manuscr.Geod., Vol. 20, pp. 182–192.

13. [13] Sjoberg L.E. (2007), "The topographic bias by analytical continuation in physical geodesy". Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 81, pp. 345-350. [DOI:10.1007/s00190-006-0112-2]

14. [14] Sjoberg L.E. (2009a), "The terrain correction in gravimetric geoid computation - is it needed?" Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 176, pp. 14-18. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03851.x]

15. [15] Sjoberg L.E. and M. Bagherbandi (2011), "A Numerical study of the analytical downward continuation error in geoid computation by EGM08". Journal of Geodetic Science, Vol. 1, pp. 2-8. [DOI:10.2478/v10156-010-0001-8]

16. [16] Sjoberg L.E. (2015), "The topographic bias in Stokes' formula vs. the error of analytical continuation by an Earth Gravitational Model - are they the same?". Journal of Geodetic Science, vol. 5, pp. 171-179. [DOI:10.1515/jogs-2015-0017]

17. [17] Vanicek P., M.Najafi, Z.Martinec, L.Harrie and LE.Sjoberg (1955), "Higher order reference field in the generalized Stokes–Helmert's scheme for geoid computation". Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 70, pp. 176–182. [DOI:10.1007/BF00943693]

18. [18] Vermeer M. (2007), "Comment on Sjoberg (2007), The topographic bias by analytical continuation in physical geodesy Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 81, pp.345-350". Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 81, pp. 445-450.